Analytics
Analytics From the Books, Not Beside Them
Most analytics tools read a summary somebody exported and draw a chart of it. These read the ledger itself, so every number can be opened, every metric says where it came from, and nothing in the board pack can disagree with the statements two pages earlier.
Metrics That Say What They Are
Every KPI is labelled by its basis. Growth, margins, DSO and DPO are derived from the books and say so; ARR, net revenue retention, CAC and LTV are marked as management-provided, never blended in.
Budgets, forecasts and variance analysis work off the same ledger the statements come from, so plan and actual cannot disagree about what actually happened.
The oldest problem in a metrics page is a number nobody can trace. Here a margin comes from the same engine that produced the income statement and says so, and a figure management typed in, like annual recurring revenue, is labelled as management-provided rather than dressed as derived. An investor reading the cohort table knows which kind of number each one is.
Variance, Explained Where It Happened
Budgets are held per department and per period with scenarios, and variance is computed against the real ledger rather than against a pasted export.
Period-over-period movements are explained inside the close, so the question an auditor asks in March is answered in the month it happened.
Budget against actual is computed against posted activity each time you look, not against an export taken on the day the deck was built. The movements that need explaining are explained inside the close, in the month they happened, so the explanation is attached to the period rather than remembered at the quarterly review.
Looking Forward
Projected statements and scenario summaries come from a saved forecast model, frozen when the pack is issued, so a forward number can be reproduced later.
A cash forecast built from what customers owe you and what you owe vendors, with a 13-week view in the pack.
Projected covenant headroom shows whether you will still comply twelve months out, using the same formulas as the certificate itself.
A forecast that changes every time it is opened is not evidence of anything. Projected statements and scenarios come from a saved model and are frozen when the pack is issued, so the forward numbers your board saw in March can be reproduced in September. The cash forecast is built from what customers owe you and what you owe vendors. The covenant headroom projection tells you in advance whether next year’s certificate will pass.
What Looks Wrong, Before Someone Asks
Analytical review runs over the posted books and surfaces what looks wrong, whether unusual amounts, shapes or timings, with every finding resolved on the record.
Every flag is dispositioned on the record, and a judgement goes stale on its own if the evidence under it changes.
Unusual amounts, unusual timings, unusual shapes. The analytical review an auditor performs once a year runs here continuously, and every flag is answered on the record. It is the same machinery the readiness score reads.
What this is not
It is not a general-purpose business-intelligence tool. If you want to chart anything against anything, you want one of those on top of an export, and it will read the export happily. What this does is answer the questions finance is asked, with numbers that reconcile to the statements, in a form that can be sealed and sent.
Where This Leads
Privacy-preserving benchmarking against comparable companies, computed without any party handing over its books.Where this is going
Everything above runs today. The planning side, budgets, scenarios and cash runway, is on planning & cash.
